Post by account_disabled on Feb 25, 2024 9:47:17 GMT
The as they allow for greater flexibility in project management which is extremely important in R&D projects which are characterized by a high degree of uncertainty and often require quick response to emerging difficulties and introduction of modifications Extending the scope of changes that will not require annexing the co-financing agreement but only obtaining the consent of the NCBR as well as waiving the need to submit periodic reports and Final Information on the project implementation should reduce bureaucracy of procedures at the NCBR and result in more efficient service for Beneficiaries. Currently NCBR has a big problem with meeting the deadlines specified in the funding agreement considering applications for changes to the project or assessing periodic/final reports.
Beneficiaries are often forced to wait several months for the acceptance of reported changes and reports are often assessed with delays of many months. Such situations hinder effective project management and cause delays including Country Email List delays in payment of the final payment. The proposed changes should therefore be assessed as a step in the right direction. Beneficiaries must however remember that the entry into force of the simplifications does not release them from the obligation to maintain research documentation and precisely authenticate progress in project implementation. The facilities do not limit the control rights of the intermediary institution NCBR and other authorized entities.
Catalog of institutions To sum up the changes proposed by NCBR should speed up and facilitate the settlement of projects financed from POIR. Some of the proposed simplifications were written quite enigmatically e.g. regarding the conditions for changing elements of the pilot line and will probably require clarification in the future but the initiative itself should please the Beneficiaries. The process of project implementation and its settlement before NCBR will be less bureaucratic and the time for processing changes will be shortened. However it is impossible not to notice that some of the proposed changes limiting substantive reporting are aimed.
Beneficiaries are often forced to wait several months for the acceptance of reported changes and reports are often assessed with delays of many months. Such situations hinder effective project management and cause delays including Country Email List delays in payment of the final payment. The proposed changes should therefore be assessed as a step in the right direction. Beneficiaries must however remember that the entry into force of the simplifications does not release them from the obligation to maintain research documentation and precisely authenticate progress in project implementation. The facilities do not limit the control rights of the intermediary institution NCBR and other authorized entities.
Catalog of institutions To sum up the changes proposed by NCBR should speed up and facilitate the settlement of projects financed from POIR. Some of the proposed simplifications were written quite enigmatically e.g. regarding the conditions for changing elements of the pilot line and will probably require clarification in the future but the initiative itself should please the Beneficiaries. The process of project implementation and its settlement before NCBR will be less bureaucratic and the time for processing changes will be shortened. However it is impossible not to notice that some of the proposed changes limiting substantive reporting are aimed.